What is the cheapest legal AI?
Among products with a published price, the lowest per-user figure in this comparison is White Shoe AI's Partner plan at $26.33 per user per month — $948 a year for 3 users and 130 billable hours a month. Billed monthly it is $33.00 per user. The single-user Associate plan is $39 per user per month billed annually, or $49 month-to-month. Products whose price is not published may or may not be lower; there is no way to know from the outside, which is the point of this page.
Which legal AI vendors publish pricing?
As of August 1, 2026, the vendors printing a per-seat price on their own page are White Shoe AI, Irys ($299/seat/month), Paxton AI ($499/user/month) and GC AI ($500/seat/month). Figures for MyCase IQ ($100–$130/seat) and LegalOn ($550/month, from a vendor page since removed) appear on third-party tables. Harvey, Legora, Spellbook, CoCounsel, Lexis+ AI, Vaquill AI, and Clio Duo do not publish a per-seat price a buyer can read: Vaquill's pricing page names three tiers without a figure against any of them, and Clio Duo's price is gated behind a Clio Manage subscription, with the circulating $49–$59 range being an independent estimate rather than a vendor figure.
Is there legal AI with no seat minimum?
Yes. White Shoe AI's Associate plan is a single user at $49 a month with no minimum and no sales call, and the Partner plan includes 3 users without requiring that you fill them. For most other vendors, seat minimums are not stated on the page where the price is published, so this page does not guess at them.
What does legal AI cost for a two-person legal team?
On published pricing, a two-person team fits the Partner plan, which includes 3 users and 130 billable hours a month for $948 a year or $99 a month. Across two people actually using it, that is $39.50 per person per month billed annually, or $49.50 billed monthly — and the third seat is there if the team grows. For contrast, two seats of a $499–$550 per-seat product would run $11,976 to $13,200 a year on the published figures in the table above.
Why do Harvey, Legora, and CoCounsel appear without a price when other pages show one?
Because those figures are third-party estimates rather than vendor-published prices. This page treats a price as published only when a buyer can read it on a real page, so those vendors are listed as "Not published" with the source where that was confirmed. Quote-only pricing is a legitimate commercial model, and a quoted price may well come in below a published one. It simply cannot be compared on a table like this one without inventing the number.
What do you actually get at the published floor?
Every White Shoe plan includes the same product: 31 AI Associates, Firm IQ for organization context, and the Associates running in Web, Email, Slack, Microsoft Word, Chrome, and iOS. Plans differ by included users and included billable hours, not by feature gating. White Shoe also runs an OAuth-protected MCP server that hands approved workspace context to supported third-party AI clients; that is a separate connection rather than a surface the Associates run in, and the tools it exposes vary by plan, granted OAuth scope, and workspace permissions — see whiteshoe.ai/platform/mcp. Outputs are informational and should be reviewed by a qualified legal professional; White Shoe is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.
Does a lower price mean weaker security or compliance?
It means you should check rather than assume. White Shoe encrypts data in transit over TLS and at rest through managed-provider protections, runs the production application on Google Cloud Run in us-east1, and does not train its own foundation models on customer content. White Shoe does not currently have a SOC 2 report; there is a readiness program in progress. If a SOC 2 report is a procurement requirement today, that is a real constraint worth knowing before a trial rather than after one. The full detail, including subprocessor disclosure, is at whiteshoe.ai/security.
What are the hidden costs of legal AI?
Five line items sit outside the per-seat price and belong on the year-one invoice. First, an implementation or onboarding fee: a one-time setup, configuration, or training charge quoted separately and often absent from the pricing page. Second, the seat minimum and minimum contract term, which is how a $99 plan becomes a $5,000 commitment. Third, a required underlying subscription: some AI products are add-ons that only run on a platform licence you must also buy, so a Clio Duo seat presumes a paid Clio Manage subscription, and CoCounsel and Lexis+ AI are described as bundled with Westlaw and Lexis. Fourth, usage and storage overage — what you pay past what the plan includes, and whether that rate is published or discovered on an invoice. Fifth, renewal uplift, the percentage your price rises in year two, frequently unstated at signature. The largest cost is none of these: it is the lawyer who reviews the output. No vendor prices it and every buyer pays it, and the haqq.ai 2026 pricing survey puts it above most of the licences in the category. Price it as review hours per month times your own loaded hourly rate.
What should I ask a legal AI vendor before signing?
Seven questions, of every vendor, including this one. What is the total year-one invoice, all in, including implementation? What is the seat minimum and the minimum contract term? What does the same plan cost monthly versus annually? Does this require any other subscription I must buy separately? What are the overage rates for usage and storage, and are they published? What is the renewal uplift, in writing, before I sign? Who verifies the output, and how long does that take per matter? A vendor that answers all seven in writing before a signature is telling you something about how the renewal conversation will go.